Jointly organised by<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/01\/HunterVally2013-pic1.gif\")
<\/p>\n
Task 38 – Greenhouse Gas Balances of Biomass and Bioenergy Systems
\nTask 40: Sustainable International Bioenergy Trade – Securing Supply and Demand
\nTask 43: Biomass Feedstocks for Energy Markets<\/b><\/p>\n
Hosted and sponsored by:<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/01\/Campinas-pic-1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n
Scope and objectives of the workshop<\/strong><\/h1>\nIn the past decades, the production of biomass for energy in agriculture and forestry has increased in many parts of the world. For years to come, further increase in land use for bioenergy will be needed to meet the renewable energy ambitions of many countries, and to reduce fossil fuel use and associated GHG emissions. As many industrialized countries have a limited biomass production potential compared to their prospective demand, it is expected that substantial international bioenergy trade will develop in the coming decades where regions such as Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa will produce feedstocks for both domestic consumption and for export.<\/p>\n
Increasing the production and energetic use of biomass has many direct and indirect effects, including land-use related GHG emissions, impacts on biodiversity, and other environmental and social effects. However, while much of the recent years\u2019 debate has concerned negative effects, it is important to note that bioenergy expansion can also lead to positive environmental and socio-economic outcomes.<\/p>\n
This workshop aimed to bring together current state-of-the-art research concerned with assessing land use effects of bioenergy, mitigating negative impacts, and promoting beneficial outcomes.<\/p>\n
The workshop addressed the following topics:<\/p>\n
\n- Quantifying and Responding to Land Use and Land Use Change effects of bioenergy<\/li>\n
- Methods for estimating land use and land use change – modeling and other approaches<\/li>\n
- Effects of bioenergy systems on GHG emissions, carbon flows<\/li>\n
- Other effects of bioenergy (soil, water, biodiversity, social)<\/li>\n
- Integrating land use change effects in broader assessment frameworks<\/li>\n
- Policy measures, standards and certification<\/li>\n
- Integrated land use strategies<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n <\/p>\n
Workshop programme<\/strong><\/h1>\nPlease download the final workshop program (includes all abstracts): Final workshop program (PDF-file 680 kB)<\/a><\/p>\nAll presentations are now available for download. The presentations have been bundled per session as zip files.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Plenary session 1:<\/b><\/p>\n
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications – Robert Beach,
\nResearch Triangle Institute International (RTI International)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nBioenergy, sustainability and tradeoffs: can we avoid deforestation while promoting bioenergy? – D. Andrew Wardell, Krystof Obidzinski, and Neil Bird,
\nCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nLand Use Change and European Biofuel Policies – David Laborde Debucquet,
\nInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nGlobal Agriculture to 2020: drivers and issues – Holger Matthey, Trade and Markets Division
\nFood and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nLand use Models and iLUC under a Brazilian Perspective – Andre Nassar
\nInstituto de Estudos do Com\u00e9rcio e Negocia\u00e7\u00f5es Internacionais (ICONE)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nBiofuels, Land Use Change and Climate Change Mitigation – Govinda R. Timilsina
\nThe World Bank<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nParallel session 2a:<\/b><\/p>\n
Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – Conceptual approaches: Methodology, modeling approaches, estimation techniques:<\/p>\n
Accounting Land as Natural Resource for Energetic and Exergetic LCA: A New Method – Rodrigo Augusto Freitas de Alvarenga, Jo Dewulf and Herman Van Langenhove
\nDepartment of Sustainable Organic Chemistry and Technology (ENVOC), Ghent University – Belgium<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nOil Price Shocks and the U.S. Bioenergy Market: Assessing Demand and Land Use Impacts – Robert Beach, Research Triangle Institute International (RTI International) and
\nSara Ohrel, US Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nWhat is the contribution to Global Warming of time-distributed biogenic CO2 fluxes? – Francesco Cherubini and Anders H. Str\u00f8mman
\nNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nBiochar: Can it reduce pressure on the land? – Annette Cowie
\nNational Centre for Rural Greenhouse Gas Research<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nTop Ten Steps to Improve Quantification of Land-Use Change Effects of Bioenergy Systems – Keith Kline, Gbadebo Oladosu, Virginia Dale, Allen McBride and Nagendra Singh, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nMethodologies to measure direct and indirect land use effects of sugarcane bioethanol – Marcelo Moreira
\nInstituto de Estudos do Com\u00e9rcio e Negocia\u00e7\u00f5es Internacionais (ICONE)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nIntegrating remote sensing and geospatial analysis to quantify impacts of biofuel expansion – Michael Netzer, Jessica Chalmers, Dr. Nancy Harris and Dr. Cheney Shreve
\nWinrock International<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Parallel session 2b:<\/b><\/p>\n
Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – Practical application: Case study results, demonstration of methods<\/p>\n
The climate benefit of Swedish ethanol – present and prospective performance – P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson, Serina Ahlgren & G\u00f6ran Berndes, Environmental and Energy Systems Studies
\nLund University<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nSugarcane Ethanol Production in Malawi: A \u201aReal World\u201e Case Study on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Due to Direct and Indirect Effects – Elisa Dunkelberg
\nI\u00d6W \u2013Institute for Ecological Economy Research<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nModeling environmental consequences of dLUC in a fully renewable energy system in Denmark:
\nEffect of crop types, soil, climate, residues management, initial carbon level and turnover time – Lorie Hamelin, Uffe J\u00f8rgensen, Bj\u00f8rn M. Petersen, J\u00f8rgen E. Olesen and Henrik Wenzel
\nSyddansk Universitet
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\ncLCA of European Biodiesel \u2013 Estimation of Key Drivers for iLUC and Identification of Mitigation Options – Nicole Kalas, Mark Akhurst, Dr Jeremy Woods and Alexandre Strapasson
\nImperial College London<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nQuantifying and Managing Land Use Effects of Bioenergy – Gerd Sparovek and Alberto Giaroli Barretto (University of S\u00e3o Paulo), Goran Berndes and Oliveira Pereira (Chalmers University of Technology) and Israel Leoname Fr\u00f6lich Klug
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nEmpirical Analysis of the Sources of Corn Used for Ethanol Production in the United States: 2001-2009 – Debo Oladosu and Keith Kline.\u00a0 Presentation by Maggie Stevens. Center for Bioenergy Sustainability, Renewable Energy Systems Group, Environmental Sciences Division
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nRadiative Forcing Impacts of Norwegian Forest Bioenergy: Forest Dynamics and the Albedo Effect – Ryan Bright and Anders Str\u00f8mman, Industrial Ecology Program, Energy and Process Engineering
\nNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet (NTNU)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Parallel session 3a:<\/b><\/p>\n
Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – continued<\/p>\n
GHG LCA of Soybean-based Biodiesel: The Implications of Alternative LUC Scenarios – \u00c9rica Castanheira and Fausto Freire, ADAI-LAETA, Center for Industrial Ecology
\nUniversity of Coimbra<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nBiodiversity Considerations in Certified Biomass Production – Oskar Egland and G\u00f6ran Berndes
\nChalmers University of Technology<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nTime-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels – Leif Gustavsson and Roger Sathre<\/i>
\nLinn\u00e9universitet
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nThe Importance of Pre-conversion Technologies for Coupling
\nSustainable Bioenergy Land Use to Biomass Trade – J. Richard Hess, David Muth Jr.
\nIdaho National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nNutrient and Carbon Trajectories, Land Use Change and the Sustainability of Short Rotation Woody Crop Production for Bioenergy Production in Canada\u00a0 – Barbara Kishchuk, Derek Sidders, Carmela Arevalo and Jagtar Bhatti,
\nCanadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre – Forest Product Innovations and Natural Resources Canada
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nFramework for Evaluating the Environmental Consequences of Bioenergy Driven Land Use Changes at Local and Regional Scales – Saori Miyake, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management (GPEM)
\nThe University of Queensland
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nA Prospective Analysis of US-Brazil Biofuel Policies – H\u00e9ctor M. N\u00fa\u00f1ez and Hayri \u00d6nal, Madhu Khanna, Xiaoguang Chen, Haixiao Huang, Champaign Energy Biosciences Institute
\nUniversity of Illinois<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nBiofuels Policymaking for Refractory Uncertainty – Michael O\u2019Hare, Goldman School of Public Policy
\nUniversity of California, Berkeley
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nGWP Factors and Warming Payback Times as Climate Indicators of Forest Biomass Use Cycles – Kim Pingoud, Tommi Ekholm and Ilkka Savolainen
\nVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nApproaches to Quantify the Biodiversity Effects of Biofuel Production – Klaus Peter Zulka, Karin Enzinger, Dietmar Moser and Johannes Fr\u00fchauf
\nEnvironment Agency Austria, Naturschutzbund Nieder\u00f6sterreich, BirdLife Austria<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Parallel session 3b:<\/b><\/p>\n
Managing land use effects of bioenergy<\/p>\n
Mitigation Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Due to the Conversion of Sugarcane Areas from Burned to Green Harvest, Considering Reduced Tillage and the Crop-Rotation – Eduardo Barretto de Figueiredo, Ricardo Bodonal, Prof. Dr. Newton La Scala Jr.
\nUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal Campus (UNESP)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nIndicators to Support Environmental Sustainability of Bioenergy – Virginia H. Dale, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nSustainable Agrofuels, Land Use Change and Certification Schemes – Kenneth Hermele, Human Ecology
\nLund University<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nMoving Forward: Policies to Improve Land Use & Address Social Concerns (when effects \u201calways depend\u201d) – Keith Kline Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nMarket-Mediated Land Use Change and Biofuel Policy: Towards An Evaluation of Mitigation Options\u00a0 – Jody Endres and Bruno Perosa
\nUniversity of Illinois Energy Biosciences Institute
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nCertification Module for Low Indirect Impact Biofuels – Jasper van de Staaij
\nEcofys
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nImproved Modeling and Mitigation of iLUC – Birka Wicke, A. Faaij, P. Verweij, D. van Vuuren, and H. van Meijl, Copernicus Institute, Faculty of Science
\nUniversitet Utrecht<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nMarket-Mediated Land Use Change and Biofuel Policy: Towards An Evaluation of Mitigation Options\u00a0 – Julie Witcover, Sonia Yeh, Siwa Msangi
\nInstitute for Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis and International Food Policy Research Institute
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Plenary session 4:<\/b><\/p>\n
Synthesis of findings – Neil Bird, Andr\u00e9 Faaij, G\u00f6ran Berndes<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nAgroecological Zoning for Biofuels: The Brazilian Experience – F\u00e1bio Marin
\nEmbrapa Agriculture Informatics
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nData, Analysis, and Field Studies to Evaluate and Minimize Land-use Change Impacts of Large-scale Bioenergy Production – Alison Goss Eng, Biomass Program
\nU.S. Department of Energy<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nSynthesis of Findings – Neil Bird, Andr\u00e9 Faaij, G\u00f6ran Berndes
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nThe Role of Sustainability Certification in Mitigating Negative Indirect Impacts of Biofuel Production – Victoria Junquera, Energy Centre
\n\u00c9cole Polytechnique F\u00e9d\u00e9rale de Lausanne
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nChallenges to Certify Sustainability for Bioenergy Production – Keith Kline, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nIs Certification the Silver Bullet for Sustainability? – Eduardo Le\u00e3o de Sousa, Luiz Fernando do Amaral
\nThe Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association (UNICA)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nEstablishing Ecologically Sustainable Forest Biomass Supply Chains: A case Study in the Boreal Forest of Canada\u00a0 – Evelyne Thiffault, David Par\u00e9, Sylvain Volp\u00e9, Denis Cormier and Perttu Anttila
\nCanadian Forest Service, FPInnovations, Metla
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Posters:<\/b><\/p>\n
Combining economic modelling and Life Cycle Assessment: Is It Possible from a Scientific Method Point of View? – Serina Ahlgren and P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson<\/i>
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\nRealistic Expectations on Biomass Potential in Conventional Forestry and Agriculture – Swedish Experiences – Gustaf Egnell and P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson
\nSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Lund University
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\nEstimating Indirect Land Use Changes of Biofuels Given Increased Organic Farming in Europe – E. Jonson, P. Havl\u00edk, F. Hedenus and S. Wirsenius
\nDepartment of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)<\/i>
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\nInstruments to Assess Direct and Indirect Impacts of Biomass Producer Decision Making: Concepts and Preliminary Application – J. (Hans) WA Langeveld, Jianbang Gan and CT (Tat) Smith, Biomass Research
\nUniversity of Toronto
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\nLand-use and environmental pressures from bioenergy crop expansion –
\nA literature review\u00a0 – Saori Miyake, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management (GPEM),
\nUniversity of Queensland
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\nPotential Effects of the Brazilian Biodiesel and Palm Oil Program on Socioeconomic Insertion of Family Farming – Andrea Restrepo Ramirez
\nUniversity of Brasilia
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\nGHG Emissions and Land-use Changes From Substitution of Brazilian Soybean with Locally Produced Protein Feed in Scandinavian Pig and Dairy Production – Yaw Sasu-Boakye, Christel Cederberg and Stefan Wirsenius
\nDepartment of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology and Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology<\/i>
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\n
\n <\/p>\n
Photos<\/strong><\/h1>\n <\/p>\n
Click on thumbnails to enlarge pictures<\/p>\n
![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_16.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_17.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_3.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_4.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_5.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_6.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_7.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_8.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_9.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_10.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_11.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_13.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_12.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_14.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_2.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_1.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0![](\"http:\/\/task38.org\/workshops\/campinas2011\/tm_15.jpg\")
<\/a><\/h1>\n <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Quantifying and managing land use effects of bioenergy Campinas, Brazil, September 19th \u2013 21th, 2011 Jointly organised by Task 38 – Greenhouse Gas Balances of Biomass and Bioenergy Systems Task 40: Sustainable International Bioenergy Trade – Securing Supply and Demand Task 43: Biomass Feedstocks for Energy Markets Hosted and sponsored by: Scope and objectives of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4384"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4486,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384\/revisions\/4486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
<\/p>\n
Workshop programme<\/strong><\/h1>\nPlease download the final workshop program (includes all abstracts): Final workshop program (PDF-file 680 kB)<\/a><\/p>\nAll presentations are now available for download. The presentations have been bundled per session as zip files.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Plenary session 1:<\/b><\/p>\n
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications – Robert Beach,
\nResearch Triangle Institute International (RTI International)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nBioenergy, sustainability and tradeoffs: can we avoid deforestation while promoting bioenergy? – D. Andrew Wardell, Krystof Obidzinski, and Neil Bird,
\nCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nLand Use Change and European Biofuel Policies – David Laborde Debucquet,
\nInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nGlobal Agriculture to 2020: drivers and issues – Holger Matthey, Trade and Markets Division
\nFood and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nLand use Models and iLUC under a Brazilian Perspective – Andre Nassar
\nInstituto de Estudos do Com\u00e9rcio e Negocia\u00e7\u00f5es Internacionais (ICONE)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nBiofuels, Land Use Change and Climate Change Mitigation – Govinda R. Timilsina
\nThe World Bank<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nParallel session 2a:<\/b><\/p>\n
Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – Conceptual approaches: Methodology, modeling approaches, estimation techniques:<\/p>\n
Accounting Land as Natural Resource for Energetic and Exergetic LCA: A New Method – Rodrigo Augusto Freitas de Alvarenga, Jo Dewulf and Herman Van Langenhove
\nDepartment of Sustainable Organic Chemistry and Technology (ENVOC), Ghent University – Belgium<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nOil Price Shocks and the U.S. Bioenergy Market: Assessing Demand and Land Use Impacts – Robert Beach, Research Triangle Institute International (RTI International) and
\nSara Ohrel, US Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nWhat is the contribution to Global Warming of time-distributed biogenic CO2 fluxes? – Francesco Cherubini and Anders H. Str\u00f8mman
\nNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nBiochar: Can it reduce pressure on the land? – Annette Cowie
\nNational Centre for Rural Greenhouse Gas Research<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nTop Ten Steps to Improve Quantification of Land-Use Change Effects of Bioenergy Systems – Keith Kline, Gbadebo Oladosu, Virginia Dale, Allen McBride and Nagendra Singh, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nMethodologies to measure direct and indirect land use effects of sugarcane bioethanol – Marcelo Moreira
\nInstituto de Estudos do Com\u00e9rcio e Negocia\u00e7\u00f5es Internacionais (ICONE)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nIntegrating remote sensing and geospatial analysis to quantify impacts of biofuel expansion – Michael Netzer, Jessica Chalmers, Dr. Nancy Harris and Dr. Cheney Shreve
\nWinrock International<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Parallel session 2b:<\/b><\/p>\n
Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – Practical application: Case study results, demonstration of methods<\/p>\n
The climate benefit of Swedish ethanol – present and prospective performance – P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson, Serina Ahlgren & G\u00f6ran Berndes, Environmental and Energy Systems Studies
\nLund University<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nSugarcane Ethanol Production in Malawi: A \u201aReal World\u201e Case Study on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Due to Direct and Indirect Effects – Elisa Dunkelberg
\nI\u00d6W \u2013Institute for Ecological Economy Research<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nModeling environmental consequences of dLUC in a fully renewable energy system in Denmark:
\nEffect of crop types, soil, climate, residues management, initial carbon level and turnover time – Lorie Hamelin, Uffe J\u00f8rgensen, Bj\u00f8rn M. Petersen, J\u00f8rgen E. Olesen and Henrik Wenzel
\nSyddansk Universitet
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\ncLCA of European Biodiesel \u2013 Estimation of Key Drivers for iLUC and Identification of Mitigation Options – Nicole Kalas, Mark Akhurst, Dr Jeremy Woods and Alexandre Strapasson
\nImperial College London<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nQuantifying and Managing Land Use Effects of Bioenergy – Gerd Sparovek and Alberto Giaroli Barretto (University of S\u00e3o Paulo), Goran Berndes and Oliveira Pereira (Chalmers University of Technology) and Israel Leoname Fr\u00f6lich Klug
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nEmpirical Analysis of the Sources of Corn Used for Ethanol Production in the United States: 2001-2009 – Debo Oladosu and Keith Kline.\u00a0 Presentation by Maggie Stevens. Center for Bioenergy Sustainability, Renewable Energy Systems Group, Environmental Sciences Division
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nRadiative Forcing Impacts of Norwegian Forest Bioenergy: Forest Dynamics and the Albedo Effect – Ryan Bright and Anders Str\u00f8mman, Industrial Ecology Program, Energy and Process Engineering
\nNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet (NTNU)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Parallel session 3a:<\/b><\/p>\n
Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – continued<\/p>\n
GHG LCA of Soybean-based Biodiesel: The Implications of Alternative LUC Scenarios – \u00c9rica Castanheira and Fausto Freire, ADAI-LAETA, Center for Industrial Ecology
\nUniversity of Coimbra<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nBiodiversity Considerations in Certified Biomass Production – Oskar Egland and G\u00f6ran Berndes
\nChalmers University of Technology<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nTime-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels – Leif Gustavsson and Roger Sathre<\/i>
\nLinn\u00e9universitet
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nThe Importance of Pre-conversion Technologies for Coupling
\nSustainable Bioenergy Land Use to Biomass Trade – J. Richard Hess, David Muth Jr.
\nIdaho National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nNutrient and Carbon Trajectories, Land Use Change and the Sustainability of Short Rotation Woody Crop Production for Bioenergy Production in Canada\u00a0 – Barbara Kishchuk, Derek Sidders, Carmela Arevalo and Jagtar Bhatti,
\nCanadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre – Forest Product Innovations and Natural Resources Canada
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nFramework for Evaluating the Environmental Consequences of Bioenergy Driven Land Use Changes at Local and Regional Scales – Saori Miyake, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management (GPEM)
\nThe University of Queensland
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nA Prospective Analysis of US-Brazil Biofuel Policies – H\u00e9ctor M. N\u00fa\u00f1ez and Hayri \u00d6nal, Madhu Khanna, Xiaoguang Chen, Haixiao Huang, Champaign Energy Biosciences Institute
\nUniversity of Illinois<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nBiofuels Policymaking for Refractory Uncertainty – Michael O\u2019Hare, Goldman School of Public Policy
\nUniversity of California, Berkeley
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nGWP Factors and Warming Payback Times as Climate Indicators of Forest Biomass Use Cycles – Kim Pingoud, Tommi Ekholm and Ilkka Savolainen
\nVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nApproaches to Quantify the Biodiversity Effects of Biofuel Production – Klaus Peter Zulka, Karin Enzinger, Dietmar Moser and Johannes Fr\u00fchauf
\nEnvironment Agency Austria, Naturschutzbund Nieder\u00f6sterreich, BirdLife Austria<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Parallel session 3b:<\/b><\/p>\n
Managing land use effects of bioenergy<\/p>\n
Mitigation Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Due to the Conversion of Sugarcane Areas from Burned to Green Harvest, Considering Reduced Tillage and the Crop-Rotation – Eduardo Barretto de Figueiredo, Ricardo Bodonal, Prof. Dr. Newton La Scala Jr.
\nUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal Campus (UNESP)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nIndicators to Support Environmental Sustainability of Bioenergy – Virginia H. Dale, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nSustainable Agrofuels, Land Use Change and Certification Schemes – Kenneth Hermele, Human Ecology
\nLund University<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nMoving Forward: Policies to Improve Land Use & Address Social Concerns (when effects \u201calways depend\u201d) – Keith Kline Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nMarket-Mediated Land Use Change and Biofuel Policy: Towards An Evaluation of Mitigation Options\u00a0 – Jody Endres and Bruno Perosa
\nUniversity of Illinois Energy Biosciences Institute
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nCertification Module for Low Indirect Impact Biofuels – Jasper van de Staaij
\nEcofys
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nImproved Modeling and Mitigation of iLUC – Birka Wicke, A. Faaij, P. Verweij, D. van Vuuren, and H. van Meijl, Copernicus Institute, Faculty of Science
\nUniversitet Utrecht<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nMarket-Mediated Land Use Change and Biofuel Policy: Towards An Evaluation of Mitigation Options\u00a0 – Julie Witcover, Sonia Yeh, Siwa Msangi
\nInstitute for Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis and International Food Policy Research Institute
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Plenary session 4:<\/b><\/p>\n
Synthesis of findings – Neil Bird, Andr\u00e9 Faaij, G\u00f6ran Berndes<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nAgroecological Zoning for Biofuels: The Brazilian Experience – F\u00e1bio Marin
\nEmbrapa Agriculture Informatics
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nData, Analysis, and Field Studies to Evaluate and Minimize Land-use Change Impacts of Large-scale Bioenergy Production – Alison Goss Eng, Biomass Program
\nU.S. Department of Energy<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nSynthesis of Findings – Neil Bird, Andr\u00e9 Faaij, G\u00f6ran Berndes
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nThe Role of Sustainability Certification in Mitigating Negative Indirect Impacts of Biofuel Production – Victoria Junquera, Energy Centre
\n\u00c9cole Polytechnique F\u00e9d\u00e9rale de Lausanne
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nChallenges to Certify Sustainability for Bioenergy Production – Keith Kline, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\nIs Certification the Silver Bullet for Sustainability? – Eduardo Le\u00e3o de Sousa, Luiz Fernando do Amaral
\nThe Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association (UNICA)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\nEstablishing Ecologically Sustainable Forest Biomass Supply Chains: A case Study in the Boreal Forest of Canada\u00a0 – Evelyne Thiffault, David Par\u00e9, Sylvain Volp\u00e9, Denis Cormier and Perttu Anttila
\nCanadian Forest Service, FPInnovations, Metla
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Posters:<\/b><\/p>\n
Combining economic modelling and Life Cycle Assessment: Is It Possible from a Scientific Method Point of View? – Serina Ahlgren and P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson<\/i>
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\nRealistic Expectations on Biomass Potential in Conventional Forestry and Agriculture – Swedish Experiences – Gustaf Egnell and P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson
\nSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Lund University
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\nEstimating Indirect Land Use Changes of Biofuels Given Increased Organic Farming in Europe – E. Jonson, P. Havl\u00edk, F. Hedenus and S. Wirsenius
\nDepartment of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)<\/i>
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\nInstruments to Assess Direct and Indirect Impacts of Biomass Producer Decision Making: Concepts and Preliminary Application – J. (Hans) WA Langeveld, Jianbang Gan and CT (Tat) Smith, Biomass Research
\nUniversity of Toronto
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\nLand-use and environmental pressures from bioenergy crop expansion –
\nA literature review\u00a0 – Saori Miyake, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management (GPEM),
\nUniversity of Queensland
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\nPotential Effects of the Brazilian Biodiesel and Palm Oil Program on Socioeconomic Insertion of Family Farming – Andrea Restrepo Ramirez
\nUniversity of Brasilia
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\nGHG Emissions and Land-use Changes From Substitution of Brazilian Soybean with Locally Produced Protein Feed in Scandinavian Pig and Dairy Production – Yaw Sasu-Boakye, Christel Cederberg and Stefan Wirsenius
\nDepartment of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology and Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology<\/i>
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\n
\n <\/p>\n
Photos<\/strong><\/h1>\n <\/p>\n
Click on thumbnails to enlarge pictures<\/p>\n
<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a><\/h1>\n <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Quantifying and managing land use effects of bioenergy Campinas, Brazil, September 19th \u2013 21th, 2011 Jointly organised by Task 38 – Greenhouse Gas Balances of Biomass and Bioenergy Systems Task 40: Sustainable International Bioenergy Trade – Securing Supply and Demand Task 43: Biomass Feedstocks for Energy Markets Hosted and sponsored by: Scope and objectives of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4384"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4486,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384\/revisions\/4486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
All presentations are now available for download. The presentations have been bundled per session as zip files.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Plenary session 1:<\/b><\/p>\n
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications – Robert Beach, Bioenergy, sustainability and tradeoffs: can we avoid deforestation while promoting bioenergy? – D. Andrew Wardell, Krystof Obidzinski, and Neil Bird, Land Use Change and European Biofuel Policies – David Laborde Debucquet, Global Agriculture to 2020: drivers and issues – Holger Matthey, Trade and Markets Division Land use Models and iLUC under a Brazilian Perspective – Andre Nassar Biofuels, Land Use Change and Climate Change Mitigation – Govinda R. Timilsina Parallel session 2a:<\/b><\/p>\n Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – Conceptual approaches: Methodology, modeling approaches, estimation techniques:<\/p>\n Accounting Land as Natural Resource for Energetic and Exergetic LCA: A New Method – Rodrigo Augusto Freitas de Alvarenga, Jo Dewulf and Herman Van Langenhove Oil Price Shocks and the U.S. Bioenergy Market: Assessing Demand and Land Use Impacts – Robert Beach, Research Triangle Institute International (RTI International) and What is the contribution to Global Warming of time-distributed biogenic CO2 fluxes? – Francesco Cherubini and Anders H. Str\u00f8mman Biochar: Can it reduce pressure on the land? – Annette Cowie Top Ten Steps to Improve Quantification of Land-Use Change Effects of Bioenergy Systems – Keith Kline, Gbadebo Oladosu, Virginia Dale, Allen McBride and Nagendra Singh, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability Methodologies to measure direct and indirect land use effects of sugarcane bioethanol – Marcelo Moreira Integrating remote sensing and geospatial analysis to quantify impacts of biofuel expansion – Michael Netzer, Jessica Chalmers, Dr. Nancy Harris and Dr. Cheney Shreve <\/p>\n Parallel session 2b:<\/b><\/p>\n Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – Practical application: Case study results, demonstration of methods<\/p>\n The climate benefit of Swedish ethanol – present and prospective performance – P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson, Serina Ahlgren & G\u00f6ran Berndes, Environmental and Energy Systems Studies Sugarcane Ethanol Production in Malawi: A \u201aReal World\u201e Case Study on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Due to Direct and Indirect Effects – Elisa Dunkelberg Modeling environmental consequences of dLUC in a fully renewable energy system in Denmark: cLCA of European Biodiesel \u2013 Estimation of Key Drivers for iLUC and Identification of Mitigation Options – Nicole Kalas, Mark Akhurst, Dr Jeremy Woods and Alexandre Strapasson Quantifying and Managing Land Use Effects of Bioenergy – Gerd Sparovek and Alberto Giaroli Barretto (University of S\u00e3o Paulo), Goran Berndes and Oliveira Pereira (Chalmers University of Technology) and Israel Leoname Fr\u00f6lich Klug Empirical Analysis of the Sources of Corn Used for Ethanol Production in the United States: 2001-2009 – Debo Oladosu and Keith Kline.\u00a0 Presentation by Maggie Stevens. Center for Bioenergy Sustainability, Renewable Energy Systems Group, Environmental Sciences Division Radiative Forcing Impacts of Norwegian Forest Bioenergy: Forest Dynamics and the Albedo Effect – Ryan Bright and Anders Str\u00f8mman, Industrial Ecology Program, Energy and Process Engineering <\/p>\n Parallel session 3a:<\/b><\/p>\n Quantifying land use effects of bioenergy – continued<\/p>\n GHG LCA of Soybean-based Biodiesel: The Implications of Alternative LUC Scenarios – \u00c9rica Castanheira and Fausto Freire, ADAI-LAETA, Center for Industrial Ecology Biodiversity Considerations in Certified Biomass Production – Oskar Egland and G\u00f6ran Berndes Time-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels – Leif Gustavsson and Roger Sathre<\/i> The Importance of Pre-conversion Technologies for Coupling Nutrient and Carbon Trajectories, Land Use Change and the Sustainability of Short Rotation Woody Crop Production for Bioenergy Production in Canada\u00a0 – Barbara Kishchuk, Derek Sidders, Carmela Arevalo and Jagtar Bhatti, Framework for Evaluating the Environmental Consequences of Bioenergy Driven Land Use Changes at Local and Regional Scales – Saori Miyake, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management (GPEM) A Prospective Analysis of US-Brazil Biofuel Policies – H\u00e9ctor M. N\u00fa\u00f1ez and Hayri \u00d6nal, Madhu Khanna, Xiaoguang Chen, Haixiao Huang, Champaign Energy Biosciences Institute Biofuels Policymaking for Refractory Uncertainty – Michael O\u2019Hare, Goldman School of Public Policy GWP Factors and Warming Payback Times as Climate Indicators of Forest Biomass Use Cycles – Kim Pingoud, Tommi Ekholm and Ilkka Savolainen Approaches to Quantify the Biodiversity Effects of Biofuel Production – Klaus Peter Zulka, Karin Enzinger, Dietmar Moser and Johannes Fr\u00fchauf <\/p>\n Parallel session 3b:<\/b><\/p>\n Managing land use effects of bioenergy<\/p>\n Mitigation Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Due to the Conversion of Sugarcane Areas from Burned to Green Harvest, Considering Reduced Tillage and the Crop-Rotation – Eduardo Barretto de Figueiredo, Ricardo Bodonal, Prof. Dr. Newton La Scala Jr. Indicators to Support Environmental Sustainability of Bioenergy – Virginia H. Dale, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability Sustainable Agrofuels, Land Use Change and Certification Schemes – Kenneth Hermele, Human Ecology Moving Forward: Policies to Improve Land Use & Address Social Concerns (when effects \u201calways depend\u201d) – Keith Kline Center for BioEnergy Sustainability Market-Mediated Land Use Change and Biofuel Policy: Towards An Evaluation of Mitigation Options\u00a0 – Jody Endres and Bruno Perosa Certification Module for Low Indirect Impact Biofuels – Jasper van de Staaij Improved Modeling and Mitigation of iLUC – Birka Wicke, A. Faaij, P. Verweij, D. van Vuuren, and H. van Meijl, Copernicus Institute, Faculty of Science Market-Mediated Land Use Change and Biofuel Policy: Towards An Evaluation of Mitigation Options\u00a0 – Julie Witcover, Sonia Yeh, Siwa Msangi <\/p>\n Plenary session 4:<\/b><\/p>\n Synthesis of findings – Neil Bird, Andr\u00e9 Faaij, G\u00f6ran Berndes<\/i> Agroecological Zoning for Biofuels: The Brazilian Experience – F\u00e1bio Marin Data, Analysis, and Field Studies to Evaluate and Minimize Land-use Change Impacts of Large-scale Bioenergy Production – Alison Goss Eng, Biomass Program Synthesis of Findings – Neil Bird, Andr\u00e9 Faaij, G\u00f6ran Berndes The Role of Sustainability Certification in Mitigating Negative Indirect Impacts of Biofuel Production – Victoria Junquera, Energy Centre Challenges to Certify Sustainability for Bioenergy Production – Keith Kline, Center for BioEnergy Sustainability Is Certification the Silver Bullet for Sustainability? – Eduardo Le\u00e3o de Sousa, Luiz Fernando do Amaral Establishing Ecologically Sustainable Forest Biomass Supply Chains: A case Study in the Boreal Forest of Canada\u00a0 – Evelyne Thiffault, David Par\u00e9, Sylvain Volp\u00e9, Denis Cormier and Perttu Anttila <\/p>\n Posters:<\/b><\/p>\n Combining economic modelling and Life Cycle Assessment: Is It Possible from a Scientific Method Point of View? – Serina Ahlgren and P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson<\/i> Realistic Expectations on Biomass Potential in Conventional Forestry and Agriculture – Swedish Experiences – Gustaf Egnell and P\u00e5l B\u00f6rjesson Estimating Indirect Land Use Changes of Biofuels Given Increased Organic Farming in Europe – E. Jonson, P. Havl\u00edk, F. Hedenus and S. Wirsenius Instruments to Assess Direct and Indirect Impacts of Biomass Producer Decision Making: Concepts and Preliminary Application – J. (Hans) WA Langeveld, Jianbang Gan and CT (Tat) Smith, Biomass Research Land-use and environmental pressures from bioenergy crop expansion – Potential Effects of the Brazilian Biodiesel and Palm Oil Program on Socioeconomic Insertion of Family Farming – Andrea Restrepo Ramirez GHG Emissions and Land-use Changes From Substitution of Brazilian Soybean with Locally Produced Protein Feed in Scandinavian Pig and Dairy Production – Yaw Sasu-Boakye, Christel Cederberg and Stefan Wirsenius <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Click on thumbnails to enlarge pictures<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Quantifying and managing land use effects of bioenergy Campinas, Brazil, September 19th \u2013 21th, 2011 Jointly organised by Task 38 – Greenhouse Gas Balances of Biomass and Bioenergy Systems Task 40: Sustainable International Bioenergy Trade – Securing Supply and Demand Task 43: Biomass Feedstocks for Energy Markets Hosted and sponsored by: Scope and objectives of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4384"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4486,"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4384\/revisions\/4486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/task38.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nResearch Triangle Institute International (RTI International)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nFood and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nInstituto de Estudos do Com\u00e9rcio e Negocia\u00e7\u00f5es Internacionais (ICONE)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nThe World Bank<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nDepartment of Sustainable Organic Chemistry and Technology (ENVOC), Ghent University – Belgium<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nSara Ohrel, US Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nNational Centre for Rural Greenhouse Gas Research<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nInstituto de Estudos do Com\u00e9rcio e Negocia\u00e7\u00f5es Internacionais (ICONE)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nWinrock International<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nLund University<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nI\u00d6W \u2013Institute for Ecological Economy Research<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nEffect of crop types, soil, climate, residues management, initial carbon level and turnover time – Lorie Hamelin, Uffe J\u00f8rgensen, Bj\u00f8rn M. Petersen, J\u00f8rgen E. Olesen and Henrik Wenzel
\nSyddansk Universitet
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nImperial College London<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet (NTNU)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUniversity of Coimbra<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nChalmers University of Technology<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nLinn\u00e9universitet
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nSustainable Bioenergy Land Use to Biomass Trade – J. Richard Hess, David Muth Jr.
\nIdaho National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nCanadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre – Forest Product Innovations and Natural Resources Canada
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nThe University of Queensland
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUniversity of Illinois<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUniversity of California, Berkeley
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nEnvironment Agency Austria, Naturschutzbund Nieder\u00f6sterreich, BirdLife Austria<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal Campus (UNESP)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nLund University<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUniversity of Illinois Energy Biosciences Institute
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nEcofys
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUniversitet Utrecht<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nInstitute for Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis and International Food Policy Research Institute
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nEmbrapa Agriculture Informatics
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nU.S. Department of Energy<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\n\u00c9cole Polytechnique F\u00e9d\u00e9rale de Lausanne
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nOak Ridge National Laboratory
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nThe Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association (UNICA)<\/i>
\nPresentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nCanadian Forest Service, FPInnovations, Metla
\n<\/i>Presentation<\/a><\/p>\n
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\n
\nSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Lund University
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\n
\nDepartment of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)<\/i>
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUniversity of Toronto
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\n
\nA literature review\u00a0 – Saori Miyake, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management (GPEM),
\nUniversity of Queensland
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUniversity of Brasilia
\n<\/i>Poster<\/a><\/p>\n
\nDepartment of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology and Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology<\/i>
\nPoster<\/a><\/p>\n
\nPhotos<\/strong><\/h1>\n
<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0<\/a><\/h1>\n